the chain abstraction thesis has seen validation in that the *quantity* of chains has continued to rise without much end in sight
but as zon correctly identifies, most of these chains don't actually produce anything of value, leaving users split between the same few apps on the same few chains
as interop and chain abstraction proliferates, alongside the drive for actual value creation in this space, the appchain thesis will prove itself
it's a bit of a chicken-and-egg problem: you need adoption of chain abstraction to make appchains viable, but you need appchains to be used to get the full value out of chain abstraction, but I believe both of these things will grow in parallel
will take a few years and some mindset shifts in the industry but it will happen, 100%.
with so many chains having launched in the past 6 months and with many still yet to launch, it seems clear that we'll have infinite chains.
every one of these chains will use their token to incentive YOU (the builder) to generate value for THEM (the chain)
but as chains -> infinity, chain tokens tend to die faster.
it gets increasingly harder to believe the next sparkly chain with the same morpho, aave, pendle deployment is going to be the one that sticks.
certain chains with very unique value props (exchange related, not designed to be a gen purp chain, lindy, etc.) will be able to stand above the crowd but it'll only get tougher
instead, YOU (the builder) should opt to generate value for YOU instead
the best way to do that is by owning your stack and building an appchain while enabling users to deposit from trending pockets of liquidity
1,936
26
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明，OKX 不是所引用文章的作者，也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考，並不代表 OKX 觀點，不作為任何形式的認可，也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下，此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章，瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險，其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況，仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。