If @cosmos can mirror the same clear "usage ->revenue -> token buybacks” loop as @zksync, with concrete revenue routing and updated tokenomics, $ATOM and $ATOM holders can benefit from enterprise-stack adoption in a similarly programmatic way.
What @zksync is doing:
🔸Fees from native interoperability + enterprise licensing would flow into a governance-controlled mechanism that buys $ZK, then allocates to burns, staking rewards, and ecosystem funding (proposal; needs approval).
How this maps to $ATOM:
🔸Cosmos Stack revenue (e.g., IBC/bridge/routing fees, shared modules, support/SLAs) could be directed to $ATOM via buybacks or fee-shares, similar to ZK’s model.
Big Prereqs though:
🔸Formal governance to route off-/on-chain revenues to $ATOM, and tokenomics reform so issuance doesn’t dilute the impact.
Source:
$ATOM ⚛️
🫡
9.16K
96
The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.