If @cosmos can mirror the same clear "usage ->revenue -> token buybacks” loop as @zksync, with concrete revenue routing and updated tokenomics, $ATOM and $ATOM holders can benefit from enterprise-stack adoption in a similarly programmatic way.
What @zksync is doing:
🔸Fees from native interoperability + enterprise licensing would flow into a governance-controlled mechanism that buys $ZK, then allocates to burns, staking rewards, and ecosystem funding (proposal; needs approval).
How this maps to $ATOM:
🔸Cosmos Stack revenue (e.g., IBC/bridge/routing fees, shared modules, support/SLAs) could be directed to $ATOM via buybacks or fee-shares, similar to ZK’s model.
Big Prereqs though:
🔸Formal governance to route off-/on-chain revenues to $ATOM, and tokenomics reform so issuance doesn’t dilute the impact.
Source:
$ATOM ⚛️
🫡
5,703
59
本页面内容由第三方提供。除非另有说明，欧易不是所引用文章的作者，也不对此类材料主张任何版权。该内容仅供参考，并不代表欧易观点，不作为任何形式的认可，也不应被视为投资建议或购买或出售数字资产的招揽。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情况下，此类人工智能生成的内容可能不准确或不一致。请阅读链接文章，了解更多详情和信息。欧易不对第三方网站上的内容负责。包含稳定币、NFTs 等在内的数字资产涉及较高程度的风险，其价值可能会产生较大波动。请根据自身财务状况，仔细考虑交易或持有数字资产是否适合您。