Alright, here’s the real unlock in @stbl_official “Stablecoin 2.0”: you don’t have to choose between using your money and earning from it. USST spends like cash while the yield keeps flowing to you in the background. Clean, simple, and frankly overdue.
The mechanics check out. STBL splits principal vs. yield at mint. Per the whitepaper’s “Stable and Yield Token” section, you deposit eligible tokenized RWAs; the protocol mints USST (the stable) + a YLD NFT (the yield claim). Docs → USST: How It’s Minted reiterates the same: use USST freely while YLD accrues.
❯ Principal stays liquid (USST)
❯ Yield is isolated to YLD (NFT claim)
❯ Minters, not issuers, keep the coupons
❯ Compliance gates on transfers where needed
❯ Protocol still takes its fee; transparent trade-off
Two extra signals I like:
- The docs on Premium Buybacks detail scheduled, above-market repurchases with burns (Q4 ’25 from foundation; later from protocol revenue). That’s clear alignment.
- Wormhole NTT made USST natively multichain (Ethereum + BNB), so liquidity isn’t stuck on one island.
Quick compare: legacy fiat stables keep the interest; yield-bearing stables force you to hold the coin. STBL lets you spend the principal and own the yield with YLD as the auditable claim.
Dev/user tip: mint flow is straightforward deposit an approved RWA → receive USST + YLD. Then watch YLD events on-chain (Token → Events) to see accrual kick in. I’m tracking vault AUM and the buyback cadence next. If you test it, tell me where the UX still bites.

8,904
236
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明,OKX 不是所引用文章的作者,也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考,並不代表 OKX 觀點,不作為任何形式的認可,也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下,此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章,瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險,其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況,仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。

